Organizations comparing Gravity Software and Sage Intacct are often looking for accounting software that can support increasing financial complexity without creating unnecessary operational overhead.
Both platforms support organizations with more advanced accounting requirements, including multi-entity financial management, reporting, automation, and growing business structures. However, they approach those requirements differently.
Gravity Software is built natively on the Microsoft Power Platform and is designed for growing multi-entity organizations that want sophisticated accounting capabilities within the Microsoft ecosystem. Sage Intacct is an established cloud financial management platform used by a broad range of mid-sized organizations.
This comparison examines Gravity Software and Sage Intacct across the areas finance leaders commonly evaluate, including:
The goal is to help CFOs, controllers, and finance teams understand the differences between the two platforms and determine which approach better aligns with their organization’s requirements.
Both Gravity Software and Sage Intacct provide cloud-based financial management capabilities for growing organizations, but their underlying platforms and approaches to multi-entity accounting, reporting, automation, and scalability differ.
The table below provides a high-level comparison. The sections that follow examine these differences in greater detail to help finance teams determine which platform better aligns with their operational and financial requirements.
| Capability | Gravity Software® | Sage Intacct® |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-entity accounting | Designed specifically for multi-entity financial management within a single database | Supports multi-entity financial management and complex organizational structures |
| Intercompany accounting | Automates intercompany transactions, due-to/due-from entries, and eliminations across entities | Supports intercompany transactions and consolidation workflows |
| Consolidated reporting | Real-time consolidated reporting with entity-level drill-down | Consolidated financial reporting across multiple entities |
| Reporting & BI | Financial reporting plus native Microsoft Power BI capabilities | Financial and operational reporting with dashboards and analytics |
| Microsoft ecosystem | Built natively on Microsoft Power Platform | Integrates with Microsoft applications and other third-party solutions |
| Workflow automation | Extensible workflows using Microsoft Power Automate | Configurable workflow and approval capabilities |
| AI & automation | Access to Microsoft AI technologies, including Copilot capabilities, plus AI-powered accounting automation | Sage AI capabilities and automation available within the Sage ecosystem |
| Multi-currency | Supports transaction, entity, and reporting currencies for multi-entity organizations | Supports multi-currency and global financial management |
| Technology platform | Microsoft Power Platform, Dataverse, and Microsoft Azure | Sage cloud financial management platform |
| Scalability | Designed for growing organizations adding entities without moving to a traditional large ERP | Designed to support growing and mid-market organizations with increasingly complex financial requirements |
Multi-entity accounting is an important consideration when comparing Gravity Software and Sage Intacct. Both platforms support organizations managing multiple entities, but their approaches to multi-entity financial operations differ.
Gravity Software was designed specifically for multi-entity accounting. Organizations can manage multiple companies within a single database while maintaining separate financial records, security, dimensions, and reporting requirements for each entity.
Gravity supports capabilities such as:
This approach can reduce the amount of repetitive accounting work required as organizations add companies, subsidiaries, locations, or other legal entities.
Sage Intacct also provides multi-entity accounting capabilities and supports organizations with subsidiaries and complex organizational structures. Its capabilities include multi-entity consolidation, intercompany transactions, entity-level accounting, and financial reporting across multiple entities.
Organizations comparing the two platforms should look beyond whether each system supports multiple entities and evaluate how the finance team will perform recurring multi-entity processes in practice.
Important questions include:
For organizations with significant intercompany activity, these workflow differences can have a meaningful impact on the amount of manual accounting required each month.
As organizations add entities, consolidated financial reporting becomes increasingly important. Finance teams need to understand both the performance of individual entities and the organization as a whole without spending excessive time assembling information outside the accounting system.
Both Gravity Software and Sage Intacct support consolidated financial reporting, but organizations should evaluate how reporting works in practice and how easily finance teams can move between consolidated and entity-level financial information.
Gravity Software provides real-time consolidated financial reporting across multiple entities within a single database. Finance teams can create reports for individual companies, groups of companies, or the entire organization while maintaining visibility into the underlying financial activity.
Organizations can:
Because financial information is maintained within a centralized accounting environment, finance teams can analyze performance across the organization without first combining information from separate accounting databases.
Sage Intacct also provides consolidated financial reporting for multi-entity organizations, including support for entity-level and consolidated financial statements, dimensions, and multi-entity financial structures.
When comparing the two platforms, finance teams should evaluate more than whether consolidated reporting is available. They should consider how easily the reporting environment supports the way stakeholders actually analyze the organization.
Questions to consider include:
For multi-entity organizations, the objective is not simply to produce a consolidated financial statement. Finance teams also need the flexibility to understand what is driving the consolidated results and analyze performance at the appropriate level of the organization.
Financial reporting answers what happened in the accounting system. Business intelligence helps finance leaders explore why it happened and identify trends across entities, departments, locations, projects, and other areas of the organization.
Both Gravity Software and Sage Intacct provide financial reporting and analytics capabilities. One of the key differences is how each platform approaches broader business intelligence and the technology ecosystem surrounding financial data.
Gravity Software combines financial reporting with the broader Microsoft data and analytics ecosystem. Organizations can use Microsoft Power BI to extend Gravity financial data into interactive dashboards and business intelligence.
Finance teams can:
This can be particularly valuable for organizations that already use Microsoft technologies and want financial information to be part of a broader reporting and analytics environment.
Sage Intacct provides financial and operational reporting, dashboards, dimensional reporting, and analytics capabilities within its financial management platform. Organizations can create reports and dashboards to analyze financial performance across entities and other dimensions.
Organizations comparing Sage Intacct and Gravity Software should consider how each reporting environment fits their broader analytics strategy.
Questions to evaluate include:
The best reporting environment is not necessarily the one with the greatest number of reports. It is the one that gives finance leaders and other decision-makers timely access to the information they need to understand performance and make informed decisions.
As finance teams grow, accounting workflows often extend beyond the accounting department. Invoice approvals, purchasing decisions, payment reviews, and other financial processes may involve managers and employees across multiple entities, departments, and locations.
Both Gravity Software and Sage Intacct support workflow and approval processes, but organizations should consider how easily those workflows can be configured, adapted, and incorporated into the tools employees already use.
Because Gravity Software is built on the Microsoft Power Platform, organizations can use Microsoft Power Automate to extend accounting workflows and approvals beyond the accounting application.
Depending on the workflow and configuration, organizations can:
This can be especially useful when financial approvals involve managers or other employees who do not work in the accounting system throughout the day.
Sage Intacct also provides configurable approval workflows and automation for financial processes, including areas such as accounts payable and purchasing.
When comparing the two platforms, finance teams should consider how approval workflows will operate across the entire organization, not simply whether an approval feature exists.
Questions to evaluate include:
For multi-entity organizations, effective workflow automation should strengthen financial controls while reducing unnecessary manual routing and administrative work.
Artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly important in accounting as finance teams look for ways to reduce repetitive work, improve productivity, and give employees faster access to financial information.
Both Gravity Software and Sage Intacct are incorporating AI and automation into financial management. Organizations should evaluate not only individual AI features, but also the broader technology platform supporting those capabilities.
Gravity Software extends its accounting capabilities with Microsoft AI, automation, and Copilot technologies, giving finance teams access to AI-assisted tools within the broader Microsoft ecosystem.
Gravity supports AI and automation in areas such as:
This platform approach allows organizations to consider AI as part of a broader finance technology strategy rather than evaluating isolated accounting automation features.
Sage Intacct also continues to expand its use of AI and automation within its financial management ecosystem, including capabilities designed to automate accounting processes and improve financial productivity.
When comparing AI capabilities, finance leaders should look beyond whether a product is described as “AI-powered” and evaluate how the technology will actually support their accounting team.
Questions to consider include:
For finance leaders, the value of AI is ultimately measured by whether it reduces manual work, improves access to information, and gives accounting teams more time to focus on analysis and decision-making.
For organizations operating internationally, multi-currency accounting becomes an important part of managing entities, transactions, and consolidated financial reporting across different countries.
Both Gravity Software and Sage Intacct support multi-currency accounting. Organizations comparing the platforms should consider how each system manages currencies at the transaction, entity, and reporting levels and how those processes fit within a multi-entity financial structure.
Gravity Software supports multi-currency accounting across multi-entity organizations, allowing finance teams to manage transactions and reporting when entities operate in different currencies.
Capabilities include:
This allows organizations to maintain the appropriate currency at each level while bringing financial information together for consolidated analysis and reporting.
Sage Intacct also supports multi-currency accounting and global financial management, including transactions in multiple currencies, entity-level currencies, currency conversion, and consolidated reporting.
For organizations comparing the platforms, important questions include:
For international multi-entity organizations, the important consideration is not simply whether an accounting platform supports multiple currencies. Finance teams should understand how currency management works throughout the entire multi-entity and consolidation process.
Accounting software can provide extensive functionality, but finance teams also need to consider how easily employees can use the system and how much administrative effort is required to support it as the organization grows.
Both Gravity Software and Sage Intacct are designed for organizations with more sophisticated accounting requirements. When comparing the platforms, finance leaders should evaluate the day-to-day experience for accounting users as well as the resources required to configure, maintain, and adapt the system over time.
Gravity Software is designed to provide advanced multi-entity accounting capabilities through a streamlined user experience. Finance teams can manage multiple entities, financial processes, reporting, and workflows within a consistent accounting environment.
Organizations should consider:
Gravity is particularly designed for growing organizations that need sophisticated accounting capabilities but may not have a large finance or ERP administration team.
Sage Intacct provides extensive financial management capabilities and configuration options for growing and mid-market organizations. The user and administrative experience can vary depending on an organization's configuration, modules, integrations, reporting requirements, and overall financial complexity.
When evaluating Sage Intacct against Gravity Software, finance teams should consider not only the breadth of functionality but also how much complexity is appropriate for their organization.
Organizations already using Sage Intacct can also explore our common Sage Intacct pain points guide for a closer look at the operational considerations reported by users.
Questions to evaluate include:
For organizations with lean finance teams, usability and administration can become just as important as functionality. The goal is to select an accounting platform that provides the capabilities the organization needs without introducing unnecessary complexity.
Cost is an important part of evaluating accounting software, but subscription price alone does not determine the overall investment. Organizations should consider how licensing, users, entities, functionality, integrations, and ongoing requirements may affect costs as the business grows.
Gravity Software publishes its subscription pricing, allowing organizations to estimate software costs before beginning the sales process. Pricing is based on factors such as the number and type of users, entities, and additional functionality required.
For multi-entity organizations, Gravity allows additional entities to be added in five-entity packs. This structure is designed to make the cost of expanding the accounting environment more predictable as organizations add companies.
Organizations can review current Gravity Software pricing to estimate the subscription investment based on their requirements.
Sage Intacct pricing is generally provided through a customized quote based on an organization's requirements. Costs can vary depending on users, entities, modules, functionality, and other factors included in the proposed solution.
Rather than comparing only an initial subscription quote, organizations evaluating Gravity Software and Sage Intacct should consider:
For growing multi-entity organizations, the more useful comparison is not simply which accounting system costs less today, but how the overall investment aligns with the functionality and complexity the organization actually needs.
Gravity Software and Sage Intacct both support organizations with sophisticated financial management requirements. The better fit depends on the complexity your organization needs, how your finance team operates, and the technology environment you want to support over time.
The decision should not come down to which platform has the longest feature list. Finance leaders should determine which system provides the accounting capabilities they need while aligning with their organization's entity structure, reporting requirements, workflows, technology strategy, internal resources, and expected growth.
Choosing between Gravity Software and Sage Intacct depends on more than individual accounting features. The right platform should support your organization’s entity structure, financial processes, reporting requirements, technology strategy, and plans for growth.
For organizations managing multiple entities, the evaluation should also consider how efficiently the finance team can manage intercompany activity, consolidated reporting, workflows, business intelligence, and other recurring accounting processes as complexity increases.
If you're comparing additional platforms, explore our guide to Sage Intacct alternatives for growing multi-entity businesses to understand the capabilities finance teams should evaluate when considering a change.
Gravity Software is designed specifically for growing multi-entity organizations and is built natively on the Microsoft Power Platform. If your organization is evaluating Gravity Software and Sage Intacct, a personalized demonstration can help you see how Gravity would support your specific entity structure, accounting processes, and reporting requirements.
Schedule a Gravity Software demo to see how the platform could work for your organization.
Gravity Software
Better. Smarter. Accounting.