Gravity Software vs Sage Intacct cloud financials

Organizations comparing Gravity Software and Sage Intacct are often looking for accounting software that can support increasing financial complexity without creating unnecessary operational overhead.

Both platforms support organizations with more advanced accounting requirements, including multi-entity financial management, reporting, automation, and growing business structures. However, they approach those requirements differently.

Gravity Software is built natively on the Microsoft Power Platform and is designed for growing multi-entity organizations that want sophisticated accounting capabilities within the Microsoft ecosystem. Sage Intacct is an established cloud financial management platform used by a broad range of mid-sized organizations.

This comparison examines Gravity Software and Sage Intacct across the areas finance leaders commonly evaluate, including:

• Multi-entity and intercompany accounting
• Consolidated financial reporting
• Reporting and business intelligence
• Workflow automation
• AI capabilities
• Microsoft ecosystem integration
• Multi-currency accounting
• Usability and administration
• Scalability
• Pricing and cost considerations

The goal is to help CFOs, controllers, and finance teams understand the differences between the two platforms and determine which approach better aligns with their organization’s requirements.

Gravity Software vs Sage Intacct comparison

Both Gravity Software and Sage Intacct provide cloud-based financial management capabilities for growing organizations, but their underlying platforms and approaches to multi-entity accounting, reporting, automation, and scalability differ.

The table below provides a high-level comparison. The sections that follow examine these differences in greater detail to help finance teams determine which platform better aligns with their operational and financial requirements.

Multi-entity and intercompany accounting

Multi-entity accounting is an important consideration when comparing Gravity Software and Sage Intacct. Both platforms support organizations managing multiple entities, but their approaches to multi-entity financial operations differ.

Gravity Software

Gravity Software was designed specifically for multi-entity accounting. Organizations can manage multiple companies within a single database while maintaining separate financial records, security, dimensions, and reporting requirements for each entity.

Gravity supports capabilities such as:

• Managing multiple entities from one accounting environment.
• Automated due-to/due-from entries for intercompany transactions.
• Centralized processing across multiple entities.
• Intercompany eliminations.
• Flexible entity groupings and organizational hierarchies.
• Consolidated reporting with the ability to analyze individual entities or groups of entities.

This approach can reduce the amount of repetitive accounting work required as organizations add companies, subsidiaries, locations, or other legal entities.

Sage Intacct

Sage Intacct also provides multi-entity accounting capabilities and supports organizations with subsidiaries and complex organizational structures. Its capabilities include multi-entity consolidation, intercompany transactions, entity-level accounting, and financial reporting across multiple entities.

Organizations comparing the two platforms should look beyond whether each system supports multiple entities and evaluate how the finance team will perform recurring multi-entity processes in practice.

Important questions include:

• How are intercompany transactions created and balanced?
• How are due-to/due-from entries handled?
• How are eliminations managed?
• Can transactions be processed efficiently across multiple entities?
• How easily can finance teams move between entity-level and consolidated information?
• What happens operationally as additional entities are added?

For organizations with significant intercompany activity, these workflow differences can have a meaningful impact on the amount of manual accounting required each month.

Consolidated financial reporting

As organizations add entities, consolidated financial reporting becomes increasingly important. Finance teams need to understand both the performance of individual entities and the organization as a whole without spending excessive time assembling information outside the accounting system.

Both Gravity Software and Sage Intacct support consolidated financial reporting, but organizations should evaluate how reporting works in practice and how easily finance teams can move between consolidated and entity-level financial information.

Gravity Software

Gravity Software provides real-time consolidated financial reporting across multiple entities within a single database. Finance teams can create reports for individual companies, groups of companies, or the entire organization while maintaining visibility into the underlying financial activity.

Organizations can:

• Consolidate financial information across multiple entities.
• Create custom groups of entities for reporting.
• View individual entity and consolidated financial results.
• Drill into underlying financial information.
• Account for intercompany eliminations within consolidated reporting.
• Analyze financial information using dimensions and organizational hierarchies.
• Extend financial analysis and visualization through Microsoft Power BI.

Because financial information is maintained within a centralized accounting environment, finance teams can analyze performance across the organization without first combining information from separate accounting databases.

Sage Intacct

Sage Intacct also provides consolidated financial reporting for multi-entity organizations, including support for entity-level and consolidated financial statements, dimensions, and multi-entity financial structures.

When comparing the two platforms, finance teams should evaluate more than whether consolidated reporting is available. They should consider how easily the reporting environment supports the way stakeholders actually analyze the organization.

Questions to consider include:

• Can reports be created for individual entities and custom groups of entities?
• How are intercompany eliminations reflected in consolidated results?
• Can users move from consolidated results to underlying financial detail?
• How easily can reporting structures change as entities are added or reorganized?
• Can financial and operational information be analyzed together?
• How much spreadsheet work is required outside the accounting platform?
• What business intelligence tools are available for deeper analysis?

For multi-entity organizations, the objective is not simply to produce a consolidated financial statement. Finance teams also need the flexibility to understand what is driving the consolidated results and analyze performance at the appropriate level of the organization.

Financial reporting and business intelligence

Financial reporting answers what happened in the accounting system. Business intelligence helps finance leaders explore why it happened and identify trends across entities, departments, locations, projects, and other areas of the organization.

Both Gravity Software and Sage Intacct provide financial reporting and analytics capabilities. One of the key differences is how each platform approaches broader business intelligence and the technology ecosystem surrounding financial data.

Gravity Software

Gravity Software combines financial reporting with the broader Microsoft data and analytics ecosystem. Because Gravity is built on the Microsoft Power Platform, organizations can use Microsoft Power BI to extend financial data into interactive dashboards and business intelligence.

Finance teams can:

• Create financial reports across individual entities or consolidated groups.
• Analyze results using dimensions and other financial attributes.
• Build interactive Power BI dashboards and visualizations.
• Drill into financial information to investigate underlying results.
• Combine accounting information with operational data for broader business analysis.
• Create role-specific dashboards for executives, finance teams, and other stakeholders.
• Use familiar Microsoft technologies such as Excel alongside financial reporting and analytics.

This can be particularly valuable for organizations that already use Microsoft technologies and want financial information to be part of a broader reporting and analytics environment.

Sage Intacct

Sage Intacct provides financial and operational reporting, dashboards, dimensional reporting, and analytics capabilities within its financial management platform. Organizations can create reports and dashboards to analyze financial performance across entities and other dimensions.

Organizations comparing Sage Intacct and Gravity Software should consider how each reporting environment fits their broader analytics strategy.

Questions to evaluate include:

• Can finance users create and modify the reports they need?
• How easily can users analyze information across entities and dimensions?
• Can executives access dashboards without relying on manually prepared spreadsheets?
• Can accounting information be combined with operational information?
• What tools are required for advanced visualization and business intelligence?
• How easily can users move from a dashboard or report to the underlying financial detail?
• Does the reporting environment fit the organization's existing technology ecosystem?

The best reporting environment is not necessarily the one with the greatest number of reports. It is the one that gives finance leaders and other decision-makers timely access to the information they need to understand performance and make informed decisions.

Workflow automation and approvals

As finance teams grow, accounting workflows often extend beyond the accounting department. Invoice approvals, purchasing decisions, payment reviews, and other financial processes may involve managers and employees across multiple entities, departments, and locations.

Both Gravity Software and Sage Intacct support workflow and approval processes, but organizations should consider how easily those workflows can be configured, adapted, and incorporated into the tools employees already use.

Gravity Software

Because Gravity Software is built on the Microsoft Power Platform, organizations can use Microsoft Power Automate to extend accounting workflows and approvals beyond the accounting application.

Depending on the workflow and configuration, organizations can:

• Create approval rules based on entity, amount, department, or other criteria.
• Route transactions to the appropriate approvers.
• Automate notifications and approval steps.
• Support multi-level approval processes.
• Incorporate Outlook and Microsoft Teams into approval workflows.
• Build workflows that extend beyond accounting into other Microsoft applications.
• Adapt workflows as organizational requirements change.

This can be especially useful when financial approvals involve managers or other employees who do not work in the accounting system throughout the day.

Sage Intacct

Sage Intacct also provides configurable approval workflows and automation for financial processes, including areas such as accounts payable and purchasing.

When comparing the two platforms, finance teams should consider how approval workflows will operate across the entire organization, not simply whether an approval feature exists.

Questions to evaluate include:

• Can approval rules vary by entity, department, amount, or transaction type?
• How easily can approval routing be changed as responsibilities change?
• Can approvers review and act on transactions from tools they already use?
• What information is available to an approver before making a decision?
• Can workflows extend beyond the accounting application?
• How much administration is required to maintain workflow rules?
• Is there a clear audit trail of approvals and changes?

For multi-entity organizations, effective workflow automation should strengthen financial controls while reducing unnecessary manual routing and administrative work.

AI and accounting automation

Artificial intelligence is becoming increasingly important in accounting as finance teams look for ways to reduce repetitive work, improve productivity, and give employees faster access to financial information.

Both Gravity Software and Sage Intacct are incorporating AI and automation into financial management. Organizations should evaluate not only individual AI features, but also the broader technology platform supporting those capabilities.

Gravity Software

Because Gravity Software is built natively on the Microsoft Power Platform, organizations can take advantage of Microsoft's continuing investment in AI, automation, and Copilot technologies alongside Gravity's accounting capabilities.

Gravity supports AI and automation in areas such as:

• AI-powered invoice capture and accounts payable automation.
• Automated extraction of invoice information to reduce manual data entry.
• Accounting and approval workflows using Microsoft Power Automate.
• Microsoft Copilot capabilities for interacting with financial information, where appropriately licensed and configured.
• Power BI for financial analysis and visualization.
• Extending automation across Gravity and other applications in the Microsoft ecosystem.

This platform approach allows organizations to consider AI as part of a broader finance technology strategy rather than evaluating isolated accounting automation features.

Sage Intacct

Sage Intacct also continues to expand its use of AI and automation within its financial management ecosystem, including capabilities designed to automate accounting processes and improve financial productivity.

When comparing AI capabilities, finance leaders should look beyond whether a product is described as “AI-powered” and evaluate how the technology will actually support their accounting team.

Questions to consider include:

• Which accounting processes can AI automate today?
• Can AI reduce manual data entry and repetitive accounting tasks?
• How does AI interact with financial and operational information?
• Can automation extend beyond the accounting application?
• What additional licensing or configuration is required?
• How does the platform's AI strategy align with the organization's existing technology environment?
• How will new AI capabilities become available as the underlying platform evolves?

For finance leaders, the value of AI is ultimately measured by whether it reduces manual work, improves access to information, and gives accounting teams more time to focus on analysis and decision-making.

Multi-currency accounting

For organizations operating internationally, multi-currency accounting becomes an important part of managing entities, transactions, and consolidated financial reporting across different countries.

Both Gravity Software and Sage Intacct support multi-currency accounting. Organizations comparing the platforms should consider how each system manages currencies at the transaction, entity, and reporting levels and how those processes fit within a multi-entity financial structure.

Gravity Software

Gravity Software supports multi-currency accounting across multi-entity organizations, allowing finance teams to manage transactions and reporting when entities operate in different currencies.

Capabilities include:

• Transaction currencies for customers, vendors, and other financial activity.
• Entity-level functional currencies.
• Reporting currencies for consolidated financial analysis.
• Currency conversion across multi-entity financial structures.
• Foreign currency revaluation.
• Recognition of currency translation adjustments.
• Consolidated reporting across entities operating in different currencies.

This allows organizations to maintain the appropriate currency at each level while bringing financial information together for consolidated analysis and reporting.

Sage Intacct

Sage Intacct also supports multi-currency accounting and global financial management, including transactions in multiple currencies, entity-level currencies, currency conversion, and consolidated reporting.

For organizations comparing the platforms, important questions include:

• Can each entity maintain its appropriate functional currency?
• How are transactions in foreign currencies recorded and converted?
• How are exchange-rate changes and foreign currency revaluations handled?
• How are currency translation adjustments reflected in consolidated financial statements?
• Can consolidated financial results be presented in the organization's desired reporting currency?
• How easily can finance teams analyze both entity-level and consolidated results across currencies?

For international multi-entity organizations, the important consideration is not simply whether an accounting platform supports multiple currencies. Finance teams should understand how currency management works throughout the entire multi-entity and consolidation process.

Usability and administration

Accounting software can provide extensive functionality, but finance teams also need to consider how easily employees can use the system and how much administrative effort is required to support it as the organization grows.

Both Gravity Software and Sage Intacct are designed for organizations with more sophisticated accounting requirements. When comparing the platforms, finance leaders should evaluate the day-to-day experience for accounting users as well as the resources required to configure, maintain, and adapt the system over time.

Gravity Software

Gravity Software is designed to provide advanced multi-entity accounting capabilities through a streamlined user experience. Because Gravity is built on Microsoft technology, the interface and tools can also feel familiar to organizations already working within the Microsoft ecosystem.

Organizations should consider:

• How easily users can navigate between entities and financial processes.
• How quickly new accounting users can learn the system.
• Whether finance teams can configure reports, views, and workflows without excessive technical support.
• How easily the system can adapt as entities, users, and processes change.
• Whether common accounting processes can be standardized across the organization.
• How much ongoing system administration is required.

Gravity is particularly designed for growing organizations that need sophisticated accounting capabilities but may not have a large finance or ERP administration team.

Sage Intacct

Sage Intacct provides extensive financial management capabilities and configuration options for growing and mid-market organizations. The user and administrative experience can vary depending on an organization's configuration, modules, integrations, reporting requirements, and overall financial complexity.

When evaluating Sage Intacct against Gravity Software, finance teams should consider not only the breadth of functionality but also how much complexity is appropriate for their organization.

Organizations already using Sage Intacct can also explore our common Sage Intacct pain points guide for a closer look at the operational considerations reported by users.

Questions to evaluate include:

• How intuitive are routine accounting processes for everyday users?
• How much training is required for new users?
• Who will maintain configurations, workflows, reports, and integrations?
• How easily can finance users make changes as business requirements evolve?
• When is outside consulting or technical expertise required?
• Does the administrative effort align with the size and resources of the finance team?

For organizations with lean finance teams, usability and administration can become just as important as functionality. The goal is to select an accounting platform that provides the capabilities the organization needs without introducing unnecessary complexity.

How should organizations compare Sage Intacct and Gravity Software costs?

Cost is an important part of evaluating accounting software, but subscription price alone does not determine the overall investment. Organizations should consider how licensing, users, entities, functionality, integrations, and ongoing requirements may affect costs as the business grows.

Gravity Software

Gravity Software publishes its subscription pricing, allowing organizations to estimate software costs before beginning the sales process. Pricing is based on factors such as the number and type of users, entities, and additional functionality required.

For multi-entity organizations, Gravity allows additional entities to be added in five-entity packs. This structure is designed to make the cost of expanding the accounting environment more predictable as organizations add companies.

Organizations can review current Gravity Software pricing to estimate the subscription investment based on their requirements.

Sage Intacct

Sage Intacct pricing is generally provided through a customized quote based on an organization's requirements. Costs can vary depending on users, entities, modules, functionality, and other factors included in the proposed solution.

Rather than comparing only an initial subscription quote, organizations evaluating Gravity Software and Sage Intacct should consider:

• Which capabilities are included in the proposed subscription?
• How does pricing change as additional users or entities are added?
• Which additional modules or functionality will be required?
• Are third-party applications or integrations necessary?
• What is the contract term, and what price increases or renewal escalations should be expected during and after that term?
• What ongoing administrative or consulting resources may be needed?
• How predictable will costs be as the organization grows?

For growing multi-entity organizations, the more useful comparison is not simply which accounting system costs less today, but how the overall investment aligns with the functionality and complexity the organization actually needs.

Which accounting platform better fits your organization?

Gravity Software and Sage Intacct both support organizations with sophisticated financial management requirements. The better fit depends on the complexity your organization needs, how your finance team operates, and the technology environment you want to support over time.

Gravity Software may be a strong fit if you:

• Manage multiple companies, subsidiaries, or other legal entities.
• Want multi-entity and intercompany accounting to be central to the accounting environment.
• Need consolidated reporting with visibility into individual entities and groups of entities.
• Have a lean finance team and prioritize ease of use and operational efficiency.
• Want to use Microsoft Power BI for financial and operational analysis.
• Want to extend workflows and approvals through Microsoft Power Automate, Outlook, or Teams.
• Already use Microsoft technologies and value an accounting platform built natively on the Microsoft Power Platform.
• Want access to Microsoft AI and Copilot capabilities as those technologies become part of your finance strategy.
• Want a published pricing structure that can scale as additional entities are added.

Sage Intacct may be a strong fit if you:

• Want an established cloud financial management platform with a broad mid-market presence.
• Need financial management capabilities across complex organizational structures.
• Value Sage Intacct's dimensional accounting and reporting capabilities.
• Want access to Sage's ecosystem of modules, integrations, and marketplace solutions.
• Have requirements that align well with Sage Intacct's broader financial management ecosystem.
• Are comfortable with a solution whose pricing and configuration are tailored through the evaluation and implementation process.

The decision should not come down to which platform has the longest feature list. Finance leaders should determine which system provides the accounting capabilities they need while aligning with their organization's entity structure, reporting requirements, workflows, technology strategy, internal resources, and expected growth.

Compare Gravity Software and Sage Intacct for your organization

Choosing between Gravity Software and Sage Intacct depends on more than individual accounting features. The right platform should support your organization’s entity structure, financial processes, reporting requirements, technology strategy, and plans for growth.

For organizations managing multiple entities, the evaluation should also consider how efficiently the finance team can manage intercompany activity, consolidated reporting, workflows, business intelligence, and other recurring accounting processes as complexity increases.

Gravity Software is designed specifically for growing multi-entity organizations and is built natively on the Microsoft Power Platform. If your organization is evaluating Gravity Software and Sage Intacct, a personalized demonstration can help you see how Gravity would support your specific entity structure, accounting processes, and reporting requirements.

Schedule a Gravity Software demo to see how the platform could work for your organization.

Gravity Software

Better. Smarter. Accounting.